Audio Abstracts are changing the way scientific research is being communicated. Watch Tan’s video below where he delves into his article Running Momentum: A New Method to Quantify Prolonged High-Intensity Intermittent Running Performance’, highlighting the purpose of the study, its limitations and the practical applications. If you want to read the abstract or access the full paper (where available), all links are below.
The full paper can be found on Researchgate
Tannath can be found on Twitter @tannathscott
Abstract: This study determined differences in prolonged high-intensity running (PHIR) performance and running momentum (pIFT) between competition levels and positional groups in rugby league. Methods: Elite Australian National Rugby League (NRL), sub-elite [state-based competition (SRL); National Youth Competition (NYC); local league (LL)] and junior-elite (U18; U16) rugby league players completed the 30–15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30–15IFT) to quantify PHIR performance. Final running momentum (pIFT; kg·m∙s⁻¹) was calculated as the product of body mass and final running velocity (VIFT; m∙s⁻¹). Effect sizes (ESs) were used to examine between-group differences. Results: 30–15IFT performance was possibly to likely higher in NRL players (19.5 ± 1.0 km·h⁻¹; mean ± SD) when compared with SRL (ES = 0.6 ± 0.5; ES ± CI), NYC (ES = 0.6 ± 0.5) and U18 (ES = 0.8 ± 0.5) players. NRL players (537 ± 41 kg·m·s⁻¹) possessed possibly to very likely greater pIFT than SRL (ES = 0.7 ± 0.5), NYC (ES = 1.2 ± 0.5), U18 (ES = 2.3 ± 0.6), U16 (ES = 3.0 ± 0.7) and LL players (ES = 2.0 ± 0.7). Middle forwards attained a likely superior pIFT (ES = 0.5 − 1.8) to all other positional groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that elite rugby league players possess superior PHIR capacities, whilst highlighting that pIFT can account for the disparities in body mass between groups.